Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites

Black Americans are systematically undertreated for pain relative to white Americans. We examine whether this racial bias is related to false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites (e.g., “black people’s skin is thicker than white people’s skin”).

Black Americans are systematically undertreated for pain relative to white Americans. We examine whether this racial bias is related to false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites (e.g., “black people’s skin is thicker than white people’s skin”). Study 1 documented these beliefs among white laypersons and revealed that participants who more strongly endorsed false beliefs about biological differences reported lower pain ratings for a black (vs. white) target. Study 2 extended these findings to the medical context and found that half of a sample of white medical students and residents endorsed these beliefs. Moreover, participants who endorsed these beliefs rated the black (vs. white) patient’s pain as lower and made less accurate treatment recommendations. Participants who did not endorse these beliefs rated the black (vs. white) patient’s pain as higher, but showed no bias in treatment recommendations. These findings suggest that individuals with at least some medical training hold and may use false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites to inform medical judgments, which may contribute to racial disparities in pain assessment and treatment. 


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Related Research

Explore Research from
Our Faculty

  • Robinson on National Committee
    Robinson on National Committee
    National Committee finds Out-of-School Programs Provide Essential Benefits for Children and Youth
    Learn More
  • Robinson co-authors report on the state of fatherhood in Virginia
    Learn More
  • A Transparency Statement Improves Trust in Community-Police Interactions
    Research
    A Transparency Statement Improves Trust in Community-Police Interactions
    New research from UVA Batten assistant professor Kyle S. H. Dobson has identified a simple and cost-effective method for improving police interactions with community members that requires only ten small words. In a paper published last month in Nature Communications, Dobson and his co-researchers found that an officer stating a benevolent intention up front — something as simple as, “I’m walking around trying to get to know the community,” — made a substantial difference in how community members responded.
    Learn More