How we feel about the deal

Recent experimental research suggests that humans are prone to systematic errors when determining how they currently feel, imagining how they will feel about future events, remembering how they have felt about past events, and understanding the preferences that underlie their decisions. In this article, we briefly review three basic assumptions that are called into question by recent findings regarding specific kinds of errors that people are prone to make. We suggest that this line of research has important implications for negotiation theory, research, advice, and practice.

Recent experimental research suggests that humans are prone to systematic errors when determining how they currently feel, imagining how they will feel about future events, remembering how they have felt about past events, and understanding the preferences that underlie their decisions. In this article, we briefly review three basic assumptions that are called into question by recent findings regarding specific kinds of errors that people are prone to make. We suggest that this line of research has important implications for negotiation theory, research, advice, and practice.


Negotiation Journal


Negotiation Journal

Related Research

Explore Research from
Our Faculty

  • Substitutes for Success? Public versus Private Competition in Medicare Advantage
    Learn More
  • Adverse selection and network design under regulated plan prices: Evidence from Medicaid

    Researchers investigate the role of limited access to specialty hospitals with certain health plans

    Learn More
  • Robinson on National Committee
    Robinson on National Committee
    National Committee finds Out-of-School Programs Provide Essential Benefits for Children and Youth
    Learn More