About News The “Do-Something” Members of the 116th Congress: Legislative Effectiveness Study from the Batten School and Vanderbilt University Identifies Member Success in Advancing Bills Mar 17, 2021 The “Do-Something” Members of the 116th Congress: Legislative Effectiveness Study from the Batten School and Vanderbilt University Identifies Member Success in Advancing Bills Center for Effective Lawmaking identifies Sens. Peters and Rubio and Reps. Lowey and McCaul as most effective Democratic and Republican lawmakers of the 116th Congress. Democrats were much more active in bill sponsorship in 116th than in 115th Congress. Despite being in the minority party, Democratic Senators produced more laws than any Senate minority party in past half century. The U.S. Capitol Building. (Wikimedia Commons)Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Gary Peters, D-Mich., along with Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, and retired Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., were the most effective Republican and Democratic lawmakers in the recently completed 116th Congress (2019–20), according to new research from the Center for Effective Lawmaking. The legislative effectiveness scores are at the core of the research conducted at the Center for Effective Lawmaking, co-directed by Batten’s Craig Volden, Professor of Public Policy and Politics, and Alan Wiseman, Cornelius Vanderbilt Professor of Political Science and Law at Vanderbilt University. “While political talking points and ideology-fueled headlines may gather more attention, bill advancement is the key to effectiveness for every elected lawmaker in Congress,” Volden said. “The Center for Effective Lawmaking is committed to undertaking legislative effectiveness research as a valuable tool, allowing American citizens to understand which officials are overcoming gridlock through bill sponsorship and advancement.” “Even in these politically challenging times, bipartisanship appears to pay off for those who seek to advance their legislative initiatives,” Wiseman said. “The secret to success for Sen. Gary Peters, the most effective lawmaker of the Senate in the 116th Congress, was in coalition-building. Sen. Peters had at least one Republican co-sponsor on each of his successful bills; and it was often the case that more Republicans than Democrats signed onto his bills. This alone is an accomplishment, as more than 93 percent of Democratic Senators’ bills died in committee in this Congress.” Sen. Peters attained the highest legislative effectiveness score by sponsoring 86 public bills ranging from agriculture, defense and transportation, to science and technology. Twenty-four advanced out of committee to the floor of the Senate, 14 of those bills passed the Senate, and 10 became law. This total exceeds the previous record of seven laws by a minority-party Senator, which took place most recently in the 107th Congress (2001–02) by Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colo.). Center for Effective Lawmaking co-directors Craig Volden and Alan Wiseman. (Batten School Communications)New patterns and trends from the Center for Effective Lawmaking’s report on the 116th Congress include: Despite minority party status, Democratic Senators were surprisingly successful in advancing their bills in the 116th Senate. The number of bills that Democratic Senators introduced that passed the Republican-controlled Senate has been steadily rising over the last three Congresses. They produced more laws than any Senate minority party in the CEL’s dataset (which extends back to 1973), even when excluding commemorative bills. Democratic women, especially Democratic women in the Senate, continue to rank highly in the 116th Congress. (Sens. Cortez Masto, Duckworth, Klobuchar and Shaheen are prime examples.) Democratic Representatives and Senators were more active in bill sponsorship during 116th than the 115th Congress. This was no surprise in the House, given their move to majority status in the 116th Congress. In the Senate, Democratic-led bill sponsorships unprecedentedly outpaced majority-party Republicans. The trend of diminished power of committee chairs continues. Committee chairs in the 116th House and Senate continue a trend of decreasing lawmaking effectiveness as consistently reported in CEL’s comprehensive dataset (1973–2020). This finding can be traced back to reforms from the mid-1990s. Notably, lawmaking effectiveness has not proven to be a guarantee of electoral success, helping more in limiting primary election challengers than in winning general elections. The legislative effectiveness scores are released biannually following the conclusion of each Congress. The CEL identifies the top 10 most effective lawmakers in the Democratic and Republican parties in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives, plus: Legislators who have the longest continuous streaks of “exceeding expectations” in lawmaking effectiveness in the House and Senate. Leading freshman legislators in the 116th Congress who were especially effective lawmakers. New to the report, those members by party and chamber who were the most effective lawmakers in each of 21 different policy areas. Legislative Effectiveness Scores are based on 15 metrics that take into account the number of bills a legislator sponsors, how far each of those bills advances through the legislative process from introduction to (possibly) becoming law, as well as its relative substantive significance. Full rankings, methodology and an executive summary may be found at thelawmakers.org. About the Center for Effective Lawmaking: The Center for Effective Lawmaking seeks to advance the generation, communication and use of new knowledge about the effectiveness of individual lawmakers and legislative institutions in Congress. The CEL envisions a Congress made up of effective lawmakers, strong institutional capacity, and the incentive structure needed to address America’s greatest public policy challenges. For more information on the Center for Effective Lawmaking, visit thelawmakers.org. Craig Volden Craig Volden is a professor of public policy and politics, with appointments in the Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy and the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics. He studies legislative politics and the interaction among political institutions, including within American federalism. Read full bio Related Content Craig Volden Spatial Models of Legislative Effectiveness Research Spatial models of policymaking have evolved from the median voter theorem through the inclusion of institutional considerations such as political parties, committees, and various voting and amendment rules. Such models, however, implicitly assume that no policy is more effective than another at solving public policy problems and that all proposers are equally capable of advancing proposals. Party Calls and Reelection in the US Senate Research Minozzi and Volden advance the idea that a substantial portion of partisan voting activity in Congress is a simple call to unity that is especially easily embraced by ideological extremists. If correct, Minozzi and Volden’s findings should extend from the House to the Senate, despite differences in institutional structures and in tools at the disposal of party leaders across the two chambers. Why Do Bad Policies So Often Spread But Good Ones Don’t? News In their new book "Why bad policies spread (and good one’s don’t)," Batten's Craig Volden and Charles R. Shipan draw from a wide range of policy domains to examine whether states learn from another to improve the spread of good or effective policies, which policies spread for which reasons and which conditions lead to good or bad policies to spread, among other core questions. Faculty Spotlight: Improving the Way We Make Laws, with Science News Batten Professor Craig Volden no longer designs spacecraft—instead, he’s engineering a metric to combat political gridlock. Stay Up To Date with the Latest Batten News and Events Subscribe
Craig Volden Craig Volden is a professor of public policy and politics, with appointments in the Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy and the Woodrow Wilson Department of Politics. He studies legislative politics and the interaction among political institutions, including within American federalism. Read full bio
Spatial Models of Legislative Effectiveness Research Spatial models of policymaking have evolved from the median voter theorem through the inclusion of institutional considerations such as political parties, committees, and various voting and amendment rules. Such models, however, implicitly assume that no policy is more effective than another at solving public policy problems and that all proposers are equally capable of advancing proposals.
Party Calls and Reelection in the US Senate Research Minozzi and Volden advance the idea that a substantial portion of partisan voting activity in Congress is a simple call to unity that is especially easily embraced by ideological extremists. If correct, Minozzi and Volden’s findings should extend from the House to the Senate, despite differences in institutional structures and in tools at the disposal of party leaders across the two chambers.
Why Do Bad Policies So Often Spread But Good Ones Don’t? News In their new book "Why bad policies spread (and good one’s don’t)," Batten's Craig Volden and Charles R. Shipan draw from a wide range of policy domains to examine whether states learn from another to improve the spread of good or effective policies, which policies spread for which reasons and which conditions lead to good or bad policies to spread, among other core questions.
Faculty Spotlight: Improving the Way We Make Laws, with Science News Batten Professor Craig Volden no longer designs spacecraft—instead, he’s engineering a metric to combat political gridlock.